Uroradiology & genital male imaging
Case TypeClinical Cases
Authors Patient77 years, male
[1] Ridgway PF, Shah J, Darzi AW (2002) Male genital tract injuries after contemporary inguinal hernia repair. BJU Int 90:272-276 (PMID: 12133064)
[2] Gulino G, Antonucci M, Palermo G, et al. (2012) Urological complications following inguinal hernioplasty. Arch Ital Urol Androl 84:105-110 (PMID: 23210400)
[3] Bittner R, Schwarz J (2012) Inguinal hernia repair: current surgical techniques. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397:271-282 (PMID: 22116597)
[4] McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, et al. (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD001785 (PMID: 12535413)
[5] Parra JA, Revuelta S, Gallego T, et al. (2004) Prosthetic mesh used for inguinal and ventral hernia repair: normal appearance and complications in ultrasound and CT. Br J Radiol 77:261-265 (PMID: 15020373)
[6] Shpitz B, Kuriansky J, Werener M, et al. (2004) Early postoperative evaluation of groins after laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernias. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14:353-357 (PMID: 15684781)
[7] Bhosale PR, Patnana M, Viswanathan C, et al. (2008) The inguinal canal: anatomy and imaging features of common and uncommon masses. Radiographics 28:819-835 (PMID: 18480486)
[8] Shadbolt CL, Heinze SB, Dietrich RB (2001) Imaging of groin masses: inguinal anatomy and pathologic conditions revisited. Radiographics 21 Spec No:S261-271 (PMID: 11598262)
URL: | https://www.eurorad.org/case/11576 |
DOI: | 10.1594/EURORAD/CASE.11576 |
ISSN: | 1563-4086 |