Genital (female) imaging
Case TypeClinical Cases
AuthorsArora A, Bhutani R, Gupta R, Mahajan H
Patient40 years, female
[1] Basak S, Saha A (2009) Adenomyosis: still largely under-diagnosed. J Obstet Gynaecol 29:533-5 (PMID: 19697204)
[2] Tamai K, Koyama T, Umeoka S, Saga T, Fujii S, Togashi K (2006) Spectrum of MR features in adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20:583-602 (PMID: 16564228)
[3] Kroencke TJ (2005) MRI for diagnosis of adenomyosis: unsung and underutilized. Gynecol Obstet Invest 60:154 (PMID: 15942247)
[4] Tamai K, Togashi K, Ito T, Morisawa N, Fujiwara T, Koyama T (2005) MR imaging findings of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathologic features and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics 25:21-40 (PMID: 15653584)
[5] Bazot M, Dara E, Rouger J, Detchev R, Cortez A, Uzan S (2002) Limitations of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis, with histopathological correlation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 20:605-11 (PMID: 12493051)
URL: | https://www.eurorad.org/case/8488 |
DOI: | 10.1594/EURORAD/CASE.8488 |
ISSN: | 1563-4086 |