Abdominal imaging
Case TypeClinical Cases
Authors
Maria Leonor Vilela, Nuno Campos, Ângela Moreira, Paulo Donato
Patient47 years, male
A 47-year-old man presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain.
Abdominal examination revealed tenderness in the right iliac fossa and positive Blumberg sign.
The laboratory tests showed leukocytosis (13,7 x 109/L), neutrophilia (11,59 x 109/L) and elevation of C Reactive Protein (4,2 mg/dL).
He underwent appendicectomy 2 years ago.
Abdominal ultrasound (US) was inconclusive due to bowel gas; then, abdomen and pelvis CT was requested.
Non-enhanced CT scan revealed a blind-ending tubular structure near the cecum pole, with hyperdense material in its distal extremity (Figure 1). Contrast-enhanced CT on portal venous phase revealed enhancement and wall thickening (15 mm) of the tubular structure (Figures 2 and 3). There was evidence of wall perforation and a 21x14 mm organized fluid collection nearby (Figures 4 and 5). Surrounding fat stranding and ileo-colic enlarged nodes were also present (Figure 6).
Appendicectomy is the most common surgery worldwide [1]. Stump appendicitis is a rare surgical complication (1:50000) and refers to the acute inflammation of the appendiceal remnant due to incomplete removal of the appendix [1,2].
Clinical presentation is identical to regular appendicitis, with acute abdominal pain being the most common symptom. The diagnosis is often delayed due to past history of appendicectomy, increasing the risk of complications [3].
Imaging findings are similar to those of regular appendicitis. US can demonstrate the appendiceal remnant as a tubular structure arising from the right iliac fossa or retrocecal region from the caecum [1].
Contrast-enhanced CT has higher sensibility and specificity, and shows a tubular structure arising from the caecum, with wall thickening and stratification. The visualization of hyperdense material in the distal extremity is highly suggestive of the appendiceal remnant. Other findings include mesenteric fat stranding, and complications such as periappendiceal abscess and high rates of perforation (70%) [4,5].
Treatment involves surgical removal of the appendiceal stump [6]. Our patient underwent an urgent laparoscopy; the stump was resected and the abscess drained. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged 3 days after admission.
Stump appendicitis should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting right iliac fossa pain and past history of appendicectomy [5,7].
Written informed patient consent for publication has been obtained.
[1] Dikicier E, Altintoprak F, Ozdemir K, Gundogdu K, Uzunoglu MY, Cakmak G, Onuray F, Capoglu R (2018) Stump appendicitis: a retrospective review of 3130 consecutive appendectomy cases. World J Emerg Surg 13:22. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0182-5 (PMID: 29849750)
[2] Aschkenasy MT, Rybicki FJ (2005) Acute appendicitis of the appendiceal stump. J Emerg Med 28(1):41-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.07.007 (PMID: 15657003)
[3] Kanona H, Al Samaraee A, Nice C, Bhattacharya V (2012) Stump appendicitis: a review. Int J Surg 10(9):425-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Jul 27 (PMID: 22846617)
[4] Enzerra MD, Ranieri DM, Pickhardt PJ (2020) Stump Appendicitis: Clinical and CT Findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 215(6):1363-1369. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22911. Epub 2020 Oct 6 (PMID: 33021832)
[5] Awe JA, Soliman AM, Gourdie RW (2013) Stump appendicitis: an uncompleted surgery, a rare but important entity with potential problems. Case Rep Surg: 2013:972596. doi: 10.1155/2013/972596. Epub 2013 Apr 4 (PMID: 23691424)
[6] Casas MA, Dreifuss NH, Schlottmann F (2022) High-volume center analysis and systematic review of stump appendicitis: solving the pending issue. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48(3):1663-1672. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01707-y. Epub 2021 Jun 3 (PMID: 34085112)
[7] Keller CA, Dudley RM, Huycke EM, Chow RB, Ali A (2022) Stump appendicitis. Radiol Case Rep 17(7):2534-2536. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.04.034 (PMID: 35601384)
URL: | https://www.eurorad.org/case/18330 |
DOI: | 10.35100/eurorad/case.18330 |
ISSN: | 1563-4086 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.