CASE 18135 Published on 10.05.2023

Giant colic lipoma causing transverse colo-colic invagination

Section

Abdominal imaging

Case Type

Clinical Cases

Authors

A. R. Goossens1, J. Hendrickx2, F. M. Vanhoenacker3

1. AZ Sint Maarten and Ghent University Hospital, Belgium

2. AZ Jan Palfijn Ghent, Belgium

3. AZ Sint-Maarten Mechelen and Antwerp University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp and Ghent University, Mechelen, Belgium

Patient

65 years, female

Categories
Area of Interest Abdomen, Gastrointestinal tract, Oncology ; Imaging Technique CT
Clinical History

A 65-year-old female with no relevant medical history presented at the emergency department with worsening chronic abdominal pain, diarrhea, and weight loss. She complained of intermittent pain flare-ups. Clinical abdominal examination showed upper abdominal tenderness without signs of acute abdomen. Laboratory test results were unremarkable.

Imaging Findings

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) was performed in the portal venous phase to evaluate the gastro-intestinal tract and to exclude (pancreatic) neoplasm. A complex soft tissue mass was encountered in the transverse colon. Axial and coronal images (Fig. 1A and 1B, respectively) showed invagination of the proximal transverse colon into its distal part, leading to a sausage-like configuration. Sagittal images showed a doughnut sign or target sign (Fig. 2). The lead point causing invagination was a large, well-defined hypodense mass of 5,5 cm showing enhancement of the wall and some enhancing internal septae. The mass demonstrated a density of -40 Hounsfield Units, in keeping with a submucosal lipomatous colon tumor. No signs of bowel ischemia or perforation were noted.

Discussion

Intussusception is defined as the invagination of an intestinal loop with its mesenteric fold (“intussusceptum”) into the distal lumen of the same intestinal segment (“intussuscipiens”). It is either caused by a bowel mass that is pulled forward by normal peristalsis, thus resulting in invagination of the involved wall, or by functional disturbances of the wall [1].

In contrast to children, invagination is rare in adults, accounting for only 1% of cases of mechanical intestinal obstruction. Two-thirds of intestinal intussusceptions in adults appear in the small bowel, most often due to benign lesions (e.g., lipoma, leiomyoma, Meckel’s diverticulum, and others). In contrast, intussusception in large bowel is more commonly associated with underlying malignant neoplasm (50-65%) [1, 2].

Colonic lipomas are more commonly found in women and occur mostly in 40- to 70-year-old patients [3]. Their size ranges from several millimeters up to 30 centimeters. Symptoms correlate with the size of the lipoma. Small lesions are often encountered incidentally during colonoscopy or surgery for other conditions. However, lipomas larger than 4 cm in size (termed “giant lipoma”) become symptomatic in up to 75% of patients [3]. Lipomas are the most common benign cause of colo-colic intussusception in adults.

Patients present with atypical symptoms; chronic abdominal pain (83%), intermittent abdominal pain (29%), abdominal cramps and constipation (both 18%) are the most common. Physical examination may reveal palpatory tenderness (37%) although normal findings are common as well (24%) [2].

In adults, the first-choice imaging technique for evaluating intussusception is CT given its superiority over ultrasound, in terms of identifying a leading cause, concomitant disease (e.g., metastasis or adenopathy) and to assess for findings indicative of bowel ischemia [1, 2]. In children, ultrasound is the preferred modality for initial work-up due to its availability, non-invasive nature, and high negative predictive value for intussusception [1].  Intussusception can be confidently diagnosed in both imaging techniques because of its typical appearance: a target sign or doughnut sign may be seen in imaging planes perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the intussusception. On the contrary, when the imaging plane is parallel to the longitudinal axis of the intussusception, this results in a sausage sign [1–3].

Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish lipomas on imaging from well-differentiated liposarcomas. Lipomas tend to have very few thin septa, while well-differentiated liposarcomas show larger, thicker (> 2mm) and nodular septa [4].

Treatment of intussusception differs in children versus adults. Barium-enema examination is the golden standard in children both for its diagnostic capacity but also for its therapeutic effect. Adults are more likely to require surgical (laparoscopic) intervention [1]. Our patient was treated with partial colectomy with end-to-end anastomosis, and anatomo-pathological examination revealed a benign lipoma.

Written informed patient consent for publication has been obtained.

Differential Diagnosis List
Colo-colic intussusception due to giant submucosal lipoma in the transverse colon
Colo-colic intussusception due to colonic lipoma
Colo-colic intussusception without a lead point
Colonic (sub)obstruction
Final Diagnosis
Colo-colic intussusception due to giant submucosal lipoma in the transverse colon
Case information
URL: https://www.eurorad.org/case/18135
DOI: 10.35100/eurorad/case.18135
ISSN: 1563-4086
License