Abdominal imaging
Case TypeClinical Cases
Authors
Andrien Rajakumar, Honida Mansour, Noreen Rasheed, Katherine Harries, Fouzia Rani, Yaseen Mukadam, Azhar Ali, Sophia Maiguma-Wilson, Hamza Rafique, Sorubaan Baskaran, Imran Syed
Patient78 years, female
A 78-year-old female presented with a one-day history of lower abdominal pain and bilious vomiting. Past surgical history included hernia repair (1989) and colposuspension (1994). On examination, there was tenderness in the right iliac fossa, abdominal distension and elevated inflammatory markers on blood biochemistry.
The surgical team requested CT imaging on suspicion of small bowel obstruction (SBO), in line with guidelines, where clinical signs of ischaemia or strangulation were not immediately present [1,2].
The orthogonal reconstructions of CT abdomen and pelvis demonstrated two transition points with twisting of the mesentery forming a ‘beak’ sign within the right iliac fossa (Figure 1). There was lateral compression of the bowel by possible extra-luminal band demonstrating the “fat-notch sign” (Figure 2). There was associated mesenteric fat stranding, mesenteric hyperaemia and reactionary free fluid along the cluster of involved oedematous, reducing enhancing small bowel loops (Figure 3). There was faecalisation within afferent bowel loops.
The aforementioned findings were suggestive of a closed-loop obstruction with impending small bowel ischaemia and thought to be induced by an internal hernia or adhesional bands requiring emergency laparotomy.
Internal hernias (IH) describe abnormal protrusion of abdominal viscera through a peritoneal or mesenteric aperture. These either arise from idiopathic defects (primary IH) in the mesentery or omentum or acquired (secondary IH) following adhesional band formation, GI reconstructive surgery or trauma. The most common presentation of IH is a strangulating SBO following closed-loop obstruction [3], and internal hernias cause up to 5.8% of all SBO [4,5].
Retrospective analyses of patients operated for SBO found mortality rates were 15% when strangulated and rose where treatment was delayed over 24 hours [6]. SBO secondary to IH has a varied clinical presentation depending on duration, reducibility of the hernia and complications such as strangulation or incarceration [7]. Thus, imaging plays a vital role in the timely diagnosis and surgical management of these patients.
Contrast-enhanced CTAP is the imaging modality of choice to diagnose SBO; meta-analyses of pooled sensitivity and specificity are 91% and 89% respectively [8]. The diagnostic challenge for radiologists is identifying IH and its aetiology, namely in distinguishing between adhesive IH (the most common acquired IH) and non-adhesive IH [9]. Imaging features of SBO secondary to IH include 1) the clustering of dilated small bowel loops in an abnormal anatomical location, 2) mesenteric fat and vessel changes (engorgement and stretching) and 3) altered positioning of surrounding viscera [10].
Imaging studies investigating adhesive IH found the ‘fat-notch sign’ which describes extra-luminal compression of bowel as a distinguishing feature for adhesive IH [9] [11]. Importantly, whilst adhesive IHs are not confined to a specific anatomical location within the abdominal cavity, non-adhesive IHs can be typified. Most common congenital paraduodenal hernias are located within the left upper quadrant [12] and transmesenteric hernias are located at the periphery of the abdominal cavity.
Emergency laparotomy performed revealed an adhesional band causing internal herniation and strangulation of a small bowel loop 45cm from the ileocaecal junction. A 90-cm segment of small bowel was resected, and anastomosis formed. Histopathology confirmed ischaemic changes within the resected small bowel.
Teaching Points
[1] Maung AA, Johnson DC, Piper GL, Barbosa RR, Rowell SE et al. Evaluation and management of small-bowel obstruction: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012;73(5 Suppl 4): S362-369. (PMID: 23114494)
[2] Di Saverio S, Coccolini F, Galati M, Smerieri N, Biffl WL et al. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2013 update of the evidencebased guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group. World J Emerg Surg 2013;8(1): 42 (PMID: 24112637)
[3] Takeyama N, Gokan T, Ohgiya Y, et al. CT of internal hernias. Radiographics. 2005;25:997–1015 (PMID: 16009820)
[4] Akyildiz H, Artis T, Sozuer E, et al. Internal hernia: complex diagnostic and therapeutic problem. Int J Surg. 2009;7:334–7. (PMID: 19422936)
[5] Martin LC, Merkle EM, Thompson WM. Review of internal hernias: radiographic and clinical findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:703–17 (PMID: 16498098)
[6] Fevang BT, Fevang J, Stangeland L et al.: Complications and death after surgical treatment of small bowel obstruction: A 35-year institutional experience. Ann Surg 2000;231:529–537 (PMID: 10749614)
[7] Blachar A, Federle MP. Internal hernia: an increasingly common cause of small bowel obstruction. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. (PMID: 11996230)
[8] Li Z, Zhang L, Liu X, Yuan F, Song B. Diagnostic utility of CT for small bowel obstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0226740. (PMID: 31887146)
[9] Dou, L., Yang, H., Wang, C., Tang, H. and Li, D., 2019. Adhesive and non-adhesive internal hernia: clinical relevance and multi-detector CT images. Scientific Reports, 9(1). (PMID: 31492915)
[10] Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Megibow AJ, Gordon RB, Whelan CA, Hulnick DH. Closed-loop and strangulating intestinal obstruction: CT signs. Radiology 1992;185(3):769–775. (PMID: 1438761)
[11] Lu, C., Xu, M., Lin, J., Chen, Y., Gao, Y., Wang, Z., Zhao, Z., Song, J., Que, H. and Ji, J., 2018. Adhesive internal hernia: multidetector CT findings and clinical relevance. Clinical Radiology, 73(2), pp.218.e1-218.e7. (PMID: 29102485)
[12] Doishita S, Takeshita T, Uchima Y, et al. Internal Hernias in the Era of Multidetector CT: Correlation of Imaging and Surgical Findings. Radiographics. 2016;36:88–10 (PMID: 26587890)
URL: | https://www.eurorad.org/case/17459 |
DOI: | 10.35100/eurorad/case.17459 |
ISSN: | 1563-4086 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.