Abdominal imaging
Case TypeClinical Cases
Authors
Rikke Bannebjerg Baarts Falkentoft, Jakob Fink Topsøe
Patient53 years, male
A 53-year-old male presented with 3 weeks of lower abdominal pain. Urine analysis showed leucocytes, microscopic blood, and protein. Physical examination was normal.
CT-urography showed a large 12 x 5.5 cm hypodense mass in the right side of the pelvic region infiltrating the upper right part of the bladder. No obstruction or abnormalities in the urinary tract. The tumour appeared to originate from the appendix and showed contrast enhancement in the edge zone and a predominantly hypodense less vascularized central part. Interpreted as a mucinous appendiceal tumour. Confirmed by cystoscopy with biopsies taken from the invasive tumour in the bladder.
Appendiceal mucinous tumours are rare accounts for 0.2-0.3% of appendectomy specimen and less than 1% of all cancers [1,4]. These tumours are categorized histologically as adenoma, low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm, high-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm or mucinous adenocarcinoma [5]. The classification and treatment are challenging.
In our case the patient had tumour invasion of more than 50% of the bladder wall and histology showed a mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma. A cystectomy, right side hemicolectomy and a HIPEC (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy) procedure were performed followed by postoperative adjuvating chemotherapy. The patient is now monitored by PET-CT scanning.
The symptoms of appendiceal tumours can be non-specific, delaying the diagnosis. In most cases (30-50%) patients present with acute appendicitis. In the advanced stages, the patient might report increasing waist circumference, abdominal pain, weight loss and anaemia.[1-3]
It is crucial for the radiologist to be aware of the signs of a mucinous appendix. Especially because the spill of mucin from the appendix during routine appendectomy or biopsy can result in polymyxoma peritonei (PMP) and thereby worsen the prognosis and clinical outcome. Mucinous ovarian cancer is another important pathway to PMP. Therefore, when PMP is encountered is important to check the appendix and the ovaries regarding primary mucinous tumours. [1,4]
The most common radiologic finding in the setting of mucinous epithelial tumours is a mucocele with or without wall calcification. In later stages PMP, periappendiceal or localized mucin deposits can be detected. MRI is recommended for staging and follow-up, the mucin is well detected on the T2-weighted series. [2,3].
The treatment and prognosis depend on the grading of the tumour which is based on the histological subtype and extension of the disease. Low-grade tumours that have been surgically removed whilst in the early stages, has a 5-year survival rate of 90%. PMP will typically require complete cytoreductive surgery, HIPEC and chemotherapy. Even though the treatment of PMP is more comprehensive, the 10-year survival rate for complete cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC is 63%. [1,2,6]
Appendiceal mucinous tumours are rare. Encountering a dilated appendix measuring more than 15 mm in diameter with or without wall calcification should raise the suspension.
Encountering PMP – always remember to check the ovaries and the appendix.
[1] Shaib WL, Assi R, Shamseddine A, et al. Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Management [published correction appears in Oncologist. 2018 Jan;23 (1):137]. Oncologist. 2017;22(9):1107-1116. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0081
[2] Leonards LM, Pahwa A, Patel MK, Petersen J, Nguyen MJ, Jude CM. Neoplasms of the Appendix: Pictorial Review with Clinical and Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics. 2017;37(4):1059-1083. doi:10.1148/rg.2017160150
[3] Pickhardt PJ, Levy AD, Rohrmann CA Jr, Kende AI. Primary neoplasms of the appendix: radiologic spectrum of disease with pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 2003;23(3):645–662.
[4] Smeenk RM, van Velthuysen ML, Verwaal VJ et al. Appendiceal neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei: A population based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008;34:196–201.
[5] Carr NJ, Cecil TD, Mohamed F, Sobin LH, Sugarbaker PH, González-Moreno S, Taflampas P, Chapman S, Moran BJ; Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International. A Consensus for Classification and Pathologic Reporting of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei and Associated Appendiceal Neoplasia: The Results of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) Modified Delphi Process. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Jan;40(1):14-26. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000535. PMID: 26492181.
[6] Sugarbaker PH, Chang D, Koslowe P. Prognostic features for peritoneal carcinomatosis in colorectal and appendiceal cancer patients when treated by cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Res. 1996;81:89-104. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1245-1_9. PMID: 8834578.
URL: | https://www.eurorad.org/case/17058 |
DOI: | 10.35100/eurorad/case.17058 |
ISSN: | 1563-4086 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.