Genital (female) imaging
Case TypeClinical Cases
Authors
Dr Reema Gupta, Dr Aman Kumar, Dr BB thukral, Dr Sachin Agrawal
Patient45 years, female
A postmenopausal 45-year-old woman presented with abnormal uterine bleeding ; with passage of clots and abdominal discomfort for past 4 months.She denied any dysuria,altered bowel habits or constitutional symptoms. Clinical examination revealed normal vital signs with soft abdomen and no palpable masses. Gynecological examination shows a non-tender cervical mass in posterior fornix with blood clots.
Transabdominal ultrasound revealed a markedly echogenic lesion with no distal acoustic shadowing,measuring 8.2x 8.0 cm showing no vascularity in posterior wall of cervix, bulging into the posterior fornix, situated posterior to the urinary bladder (Figure 1). MRI was performed with a Gold Seal Signa™1.5T HDxT with slice thickness 5 mm, intersection gap was 1 mm, field-of-view 48-cm. Sagittal, axial T1(TR range/TE range,500-650/15-60) and T2- 4,000-6,500/50-106) weighted and T1 FAT SAT images were obtained. Her MRI (pelvis with contrast) showed a well-defined lesion of 8.6 cm × 5.8 cm × 6.9 cm seen in the posterior myometrium. Lesion is heterogeneously hyperintense with multiple hypointense areas seen within on T1 and T2 weighted sequences. Lesion shows suppression on FATSAT images suggestive of fat content within with heterogenous enhancement on post-contrast images (Figure 2a,2b,2c,2d). Post hysterectomy specimen revealed a large, well-circumscribed,solid mass with yellowish cut surface (Figure 3).On microscopy, interlacing fascicles of smooth muscle with interspersed lobules of adipocytes seen, confirming the pathological diagnosis (Figure 4).
Lipomatous lesions are unusual benign neoplasms [1,2]. Approximately 180 cases are reported in the literature occurring in asymptomatic obese perimenopausal/menopausal women of age group of 50-70 years, most being retrospectively diagnosed after surgery [3,4]. It is usually well-circumscribed with a thin connective tissue capsule, average size is 5-10 cm [5].
Pathologically, lipomatous lesions are categorised into three groups [6,7], first being pure lipoma [3]. The second one consists of lipoleiomyoma [4,7,8,9], angiomyolipoma [10], fibromyolipoma [11], and other mixed tumours. The third and the rarest group is of malignant neoplasm liposarcoma [12]. Lipoleiomyoma being the most common. Origin of lipomatous lesions is controversial,with three theories being common: direct metaplasia of smooth muscle or connective tissue into fat cells, differentiation from misplaced embryonic fat cells, and proliferation of accompanying perivascular fat cells into the blood vessels [2,5]. Most cases are asymptomatic, depending on size and location, some presenting with symptoms secondary to mechanical pressure on adjacent organs as dysuria, urgency, urethral or ureteral obstruction, dyspareunia, or obstruction of the cervix.
Diagnosis of these lesions are based on radio imaging and histo-pathology. The differentiation of these neoplasms on ultrasonography and computed tomography scans can be difficult. The characteristic sonographic appearance of a lipoleiomyoma is the presence of a echogenic mass with hypoechoic rind, which is presumed to represent a layer of myometrium surrounding the fatty component. Various case reports have described the MRI finding of lipoleiomyomas, describing lesion containing abundant fat tissue and volume of mesodermal tissue [4,7,8,9]. This entity shows well-demarcated mass that is hyperintense with hypointense amorphous bundles on T1- and T2-weighted images with chemical shift artefact. It is difficult to differentiate lipoleiomyomas from other lipomatous lesions (lipoma, angiomyolipoma, fibroma lipoma, myelolipoma, liposarcoma,). On MRI, pure lipoma shows a homogeneous mass with a large amount of fat and signal decrease in the whole mass on fat-saturated images with no nonadipose component. On the other hand, lipoleiomyomas demonstrates heterogeneous signal intensity with fat and non-fat soft tissue content, and decrease in signal only in part of the lesion on fat-saturated images [13,14] with enhancing septa. MRI helps in discerning the various layers within the uterine wall, distinguishing between adnexal tissues, uterus and pelvic fat. MRI displays the internal architecture of fatty tumours and peripheral low signal intensity rim corresponding to thin fibrous pseudo capsule which is not demonstrated on CT scan [14]. Management includes hysterectomy, uterine artery embolisation and myomectomy, depending upon clinical presentation, obstetric history, location and number of lesions.
To conclude, cervical lipoleiomyomas are exceedingly rare and often misdiagnosed entities, with distinct radiological characteristics and excellent prognosis [13]. Diagnosis is made on pelvic ultrasound and MRI. Although MRI with fat suppression sequences can be useful modality for preoperative diagnosis, but most cases are diagnosed postoperatively on histopathology examination.
[1] Silverberg SG, Kurman RJ. Tumors of the uterine corpus and gestational trophoblastic disease. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1992:127-130
[2] Brandfass RT, Everts-Suarez EA. Lipomatous tumors of the uterus: a review of the world's literature with report of a case of true lipoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1955; 70:359-367 [Crossref] [Medline] [Google Scholar] (PMID: 13238471)
[3] Lau LU, Thoeni RF. Uterine lipoma: advantage of MRI over ultrasound. Br J Radiol 2005; 78:72- 74 [Crossref] [Medline] [Google Scholar] (PMID: 15673537)
[4] Dodd GD III, Budzik RF Jr. Lipomatous uterine tumors: diagnosis by ultrasound, CT, and MR. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990; 14:629-632 (PMID: 2196293)
[5] Ahmed Samy El-agwany.Lipoleiomyoma of the uterine cervix: An unusual variant of uterine leiomyoma.The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (2015) 46, 211–213
[6] Willen R, Gad A, Willen H. Lipomatous lesions of the uterus. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 1978; 377:351- 361 [Crossref] [Medline] (PMID: 150107)
[7] Chachutow D, Brill R. Lipomas of uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1957; 73:1358-1361 [Crossref] [Medline] (PMID: 13424606)
[8] Ishigami K, Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, et al. Uterine lipoleiomyoma: MRI appearances. Abdom Imaging 1998; 23:214- 216 [Crossref] [Medline] (PMID: 9516520)
[9] Maebayashi T, Imai K, Takekawa Y, et al. Radiologic features of uterine lipoleiomyoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003; 27:162-165 [Crossref] [Medline] (PMID: 12703006)
[10] Yaegashi H, Moriya T, Soeda S, et al. Uterine angio-myolipoma: case report and review of the literature. Pathol Int 2001; 51:896-901 [Crossref] [Medline] (PMID: 11844059)
[11] Soyer P, Harry G, Cazier A, Masselot J, Vanel D. Uterine fibromyolipoma: uncommon imaging features. Eur J Radiol 1991; 13:67-68 [Crossref] [Medline] (PMID: 1889433)
[12] Scurry J, Hack M. Leiomyosarcoma arising in a lipoleiomyoma. Gynecol Oncol 1990; 39:381- 383 [Crossref] [Medline] (PMID: 2258087)
[13] Outwater EK, Blasbalg R, Siegelman ES, et al. Detection of lipid in abdominal tissue with opposedphase gradient-echo images at 1.5T: techniques and diagnostic importance. RadioGraphics 1998; 18:1465-14 [Crossref] [Medline] (PMID: 9821195)
[14] Haji Mohammed Nazir, Sankesh Mehta, CR Seena, Uterine Lipoleiomyoma: A Report of Two Cases;J Clin Imaging Sci. 2017; 7: 26 (PMID: 28717557)
URL: | https://www.eurorad.org/case/16919 |
DOI: | 10.35100/eurorad/case.16919 |
ISSN: | 1563-4086 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.