Uroradiology & genital male imaging
Case TypeClinical Cases
Authors
Gasim Ahmed1, Hamza Imran1, Amany Said2, Santhi Kumar2, Saeed Usman1
Patient47, 61, and 73 years; male
Three Caucasian adults (aged 47, 61 and 73 years) with an unremarkable medical background presented with frank painless haematuria and lower abdominal pain. Clinical examination was unremarkable, and haematuria without proteinuria was seen on the urine dipstick of all three patients.
The first and second patient were evaluated initially with ultrasonography, which showed a well-defined hypoechoic lesion in the anterior wall of the urinary bladder (Fig. 1). The third patient, given his significant smoking history, had a contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the urinary system, which revealed a non-enhancing soft tissue density in the anteroinferior wall of the urinary bladder (Fig. 4, 5). All three patients had MRI imaging, which revealed a well-defined T1 and T2 low-intermediate signal intensity, intravesical mass. The lesion was not associated with extravesical extension or pelvic lymphadenopathy (Fig. 3).
Further cystoscopic evaluation revealed smooth intravesical masses covered with an unremarkable urothelium. On histopathologic evaluation, an unencapsulated, well-circumscribed, low cellularity spindle cell lamina propria lesion with benign surface mucosal urothelium was seen. There was no evidence of coagulative tumour necrosis, abnormal mitosis, or atypia (Fig. 6-8).
Leiomyomas have been described in various organs, including the uterus, stomach, seminal vesicles, and even the breast [1-4]. In the bladder, despite being the most common mesenchymal neoplasms, they constitute less than 0.5 % of all vesical tumours [5]. Virchow described the first case of urinary bladder leiomyoma in 1892, and, since then, less than 250 cases have been documented in the literature [6-9]. The vast majority of these muscular neoplasms are intravesical (63%å), while extravesical and mural tumours represent 30 % and 7 %, respectively [10, 11]. While the vast majority of extravesical and mural lesions are asymptomatic, the presentation of intravesical neoplasms may include haematuria, urinary frequency, mass effect, or bladder outflow obstruction [10, 12].
Radiologically, these lesions resemble uterine fibroids on ultrasound, CT, and MRI and may appear either as an indentation of the bladder wall or an intraluminal mass. On US, these lesions are typically smooth-walled, homogeneously hypoechoic, solid neoplasms in the bladder with a thin echogenic surface. Furthermore, ultrasound can define the intravesical, intramural, or extravesical location of the lesion [1]. On CT, bladder leiomyomas appear as hypodense lesions with weak to moderate enhancement characteristics [1, 2].
MRI adds a new dimension to the recognition and overall assessment of bladder lesions and helps in differentiating benign leiomyoma from malignant leiomyosarcoma. An intermediate signal intensity characterises the normal bladder wall on T1-weighted images. On T2 weighted sequences, a low internal and intermediate external signal intensity is observed [13]. The mucosa and lamina propria are not clearly depicted in the healthy bladder. Furthermore, T1-weighted images demonstrate bladder wall margins, perivesical structures and tumour margins, whereas T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequences demonstrate invasion of surrounding structures and the presence or absence of lymphadenopathy [14]. Leiomyoma has a low to intermediate signal intensity on T1 and low signal characteristics on T2-weighted sequences. Degenerative leiomyoma appears heterogeneous with high signal intensity on T2 sequences reflecting their cystic components in association with haemorrhage and calcifications if present. Contrast-enhancement is variable and is usually absent in degenerating lesions [10, 15]. It is of high importance to point out that the degree of enhancement is not a reliable sign in differentiating between benign leiomyoma and the more devastating leiomyosarcoma because both or neither may enhance after administration of gadolinium. Here, invasion of the bladder wall and surrounding soft tissue plains is a more reliable sign of malignancy [15].
Written informed patient consent for publication has been obtained.
[1] Elkan W (1960) Massive hemorrhage from gastric leiomyoma. Proc Rudolf Virchow Med Soc City N Y 19:135-40 (PMID: 24546577)
[2] Pavone D, Clemenza S, Sorbi F, Fambrini M, Petraglia F (2018) Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Uterine Fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 46:3-11 (PMID: 29054502)
[3] Shaikh AS, Bakhshi GD, Khan AS, Jamadar NM, Nirmala AK, Raza AA (2013) Leiomyoma of the seminal vesicle: a rare case. Clin Pract 3(2):e32 (PMID: 24765520)
[4] Haier J, Haensch W, Schön M (1997) Leiomyoma as a rare differential diagnosis of Paget's disease of the nipple. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76(5):490-1 (PMID: 9197458)
[5] Binsaleh S, Corcos J, Elhilali MM, Carrier S (2004) Bladder leiomyoma: report of two cases and literature review. Can J Urol 11(5):2411-3 (PMID: 15576008)
[6] K J (1931) Leiomyoma of the bladder with a report of a case and a review of the literature. J Urol 26:575-89 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)72801-7
[7] Wu S (2013) Imaging findings of atypical leiomyoma of the urinary bladder simulating bladder cancer: a case report and literature review. Med Ultrason (2013) 15(2):161-3 (PMID: 23702508)
[8] Hanchanale VS, Rao AR, Joseph G (2005) Images in clinical urology. A case of urethral rhinosporidiosis. Urology 66(5):1106-7 (PMID: 16286137)
[9] Xin J, Lai HP, Lin SK, Zhang QQ, Shao CX, Jin L, et al (2016) Bladder leiomyoma presenting as dyspareunia: Case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 95(28):e3971 (PMID: 27428187)
[10] Maya MM, Slywotzky C (1992) Urinary bladder leiomyoma: magnetic resonance imaging findings. Urol Radiol 14(3):197-9 (PMID: 1290211)
[11] Campbell EW, Gislason GJ (1953) Benign mesothelial tumors of the urinary bladder: review of literature and a report of a case of leiomyoma. J Urol 70(5):733-41 (PMID: 13109927)
[12] Cornella JL, Larson TR, Lee RA, Magrina JF, Kammerer-Doak D (1997) Leiomyoma of the female urethra and bladder: report of twenty-three patients and review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176(6):1278-85 (PMID: 9215185)
[13] Narumi Y, Kadota T, Inoue E, Kuriyama K, Horinouchi T, Kasai K, et al (1993) Bladder wall morphology: in vitro MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 187(1):151-5 (PMID: 8451403)
[14] Tomoe H, Okumura T, Nakamura M, Toma H, Ishikawa H, Kohno A (1991) Evaluation with MR imaging of leiomyoma of the bladder. Urol Int 46(4):349-51 (PMID: 1926652)
[15] Sundaram CP, Rawal A, Saltzman B (1998) Characteristics of bladder leiomyoma as noted on magnetic resonance imaging. Urology 52(6):1142-3 (PMID: 9836573)
URL: | https://www.eurorad.org/case/16702 |
DOI: | 10.35100/eurorad/case.16702 |
ISSN: | 1563-4086 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.