Musculoskeletal system
Case TypeClinical Cases
Authors
Tamer A. EL-Sobky, Shady Mahmoud, Mohamed Ismail Kotb
Patient9 years, male
A 9-year-old boy presented with a painful left forearm and elbow after falling down yesterday. On examination there was diffuse swelling over the left forearm and elbow associated with tenderness especially at the mid-forearm. The range of motion in the forearm and elbow was guarded.
Anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs of the left forearm showed a uni-cortical fissure fracture of the mid-shaft of the radius (Fig. 1). Additionally, the anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs of left elbow showed that the proximal radius epiphysis was non-ossified. At the same time the medial epicondyle epiphysis was completely ossified in both the anterior-posterior and lateral views (Fig. 2). Contrastingly, radiographs of the normal right elbow showed a well-ossified proximal radius epiphysis. Likewise, the medial epicondyle epiphysis was completely ossified (Fig. 3).
Radiographic evaluation of the acutely injured paediatric elbow presents a particularly challenging problem for emergency department physicians and radiologists alike. Misreading plain radiographs of the acutely traumatised elbow in children can lead to misdiagnosis and failure to institute treatment in a timely fashion with subsequent functional disability [1,2]. Contrastingly, failure to recognise normal anatomic variants simulating pathology may result in groundless over-investigations and over-treatment.
The radiologic anatomy of the growing child is complicated. The timing of appearance of elbow secondary ossification centres shows considerable variations regarding age, gender and race. Likewise, the symmetrical appearance of elbow ossification centres can show diversity. The chronological order of appearance of the ossification centres is an important guide to an accurate interpretation of paediatric elbow radiographs in the acute setting [3,4]. This chronological order of appearance of the elbow ossification centres has a general tendency to follow this sequence; capitellum, radial head, medial epicondyle, trochlea, olecranon, and lateral epicondyle collectively known as (CRITOL). They ossify at 1, 5, 10, and 11 years, respectively. Although this chronological order is a fairly reliable radiographic finding, it should be contextualised with race, gender and age [4-9]. In some studies the reported age of appearance of the medial epicondyle epiphysis was earlier than the proximal radius epiphysis. Similarly, the reported age of appearance of the olecranon was earlier than the trochlea epiphysis [4,5,6,8,9]. The incidence of normal variances was reported to be higher in girls approaching near statistical significance [9].
Generally, the radial head epiphysis ossifies before or simultaneously with the medial epicondyle epiphysis [1,3]. Our patient exhibited an atypical but normal sequence of ossification. The radiographs of the injured left elbow showed a well-ossified medial epicondyle epiphysis while the radial head epiphysis was non-ossified. This was demonstrated in orthogonal views. The fact that the patient’s radiographs demonstrated a well-ossified radial head epiphysis on the normal side, while the radial head epiphysis on the injured left side was non-ossified denotes an asymmetric appearance this epiphysis. This also represents another normal anatomic variant of the paediatric elbow. Considering the previous findings, a traumatic slip of the proximal radius epiphysis is an important differential diagnosis. Other normal anatomic variants simulating pathology include the multifragmented appearance of the trochlea and olecranon ossification centres, notched radial metaphysis and the pattern of fusion of the lateral epicondyle to the adjoining metaphysis. The child received an above-elbow posterior slab for five weeks and healed unremarkably. Additionally, the current study emphasises the potential importance and usefulness of musculoskeletal ultrasound in paediatric elbow trauma. Musculoskeletal ultrasound is increasingly recognised as a radiation-free and reliable diagnostic tool in such clinical settings [10,11].
Take-home message
Recommendation
Written patient consent for this case was waived by the Editorial Board. Patient data may have been modified to ensure patient anonymity.
[1] DeFroda SF, Hansen H, Gil JA, Hawari AH, Cruz AI Jr. (2017) Radiographic evaluation of common pediatric elbow injuries. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 9(1):7030. (PMID: 28286625)
[2] El-Sobky TA, Samir S, Aly AS. (2017) Neglected anterior Monteggia lesion with a displaced intra-articular medial condyle fracture in a child: A rare and challenging association. J Musculoskelet Surg Res 1:49-52
[3] Miyazaki CS, Maranho DA, Agnollitto PM, Nogueira-Barbosa MH. (2017) Study of secondary ossification centers of the elbow in the Brazilian population. Acta Ortop Bras 25(6):279-282. (PMID: 29375260)
[4] Cheng JC, Wing-Man K, Shen WY, Yurianto H, Xia G, Lau JT, et al. (1998) A new look at the sequential development of elbow-ossification centers in children. J Pediatr Orthop 18(2):161-167. (PMID: 9531396)
[5] Patel B, Reed M, Patel S. (2009) Gender-specific pattern differences of the ossification centers in the pediatric elbow. Pediatr Radiol 39(3):226-231. (PMID: 19125245)
[6] Garn SM, Rohmann CG, Blumenthal T, Silverman FN. (1967) Ossification communalities of the hand and other body parts: their implication to skeletal assessment. Am J Phys Anthropol 27(1):75-82. (PMID: 6058056)
[7] Bajaj ID, Bhardwaj OP, Bhardwaj S. (1967) Appearance and fusion of important ossification centres a study in Delhi population. Indian J Med Res 55(10):1064–1067. (PMID: 5594378)
[8] Elhusseiny K, El-Sobky TA. (2018) Imaging pitfalls of the acutely traumatized pediatric elbow. Oman Med J 33(5) :444-446. (PMID: 30210727)
[9] Goodwin SJ, Irwin LJ, Irwin GJ. (2019) Gender differences in the order of appearance of elbow ossification centres. Scott Med J 64(1):2-9. (PMID: 30428299).
[10] 1Sconfienza LM, Albano D, Allen G, Bazzocchi A, Bignotti B, Chianca V, et al. (2018) Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound updated in 2017 by European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) consensus. Eur Radiol 28(12):5338-5351. (PMID: 29876703).
[11] Burnier M, Buisson G, Ricard A, Cunin V, Pracros JP, Chotel F. (2016) Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in elbow trauma in children: Prospective study of 34 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102(7):839-843. (PMID: 27697406).
URL: | https://www.eurorad.org/case/16635 |
DOI: | 10.35100/eurorad/case.16635 |
ISSN: | 1563-4086 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.