Breast imaging
Case TypeClinical Cases
Authors
Nancy Sánchez Rubio1, Beatriz Lannegrand Menendez1, Estela Aguilar Navarro2, María José Ciudad Fernández1, Myriam Montes Fernández1, María Duque Muñoz1
Patient44 years, female
A 44-years-old woman with no significant past medical history and without recent breastfeeding presented with complaints about a 3-week history of left-breast inflammation and pain. At physical examination, left breast was enlarged with a hard mass in the upper quadrants suspicious of malignancy but without axillary lymphadenopathy.
A mammogram revealed a global asymmetry in the left breast. (Fig. 1).
Correlated ultrasound showed a hypoechoic irregular mass with no circumscribed margins, tubular extensions and some abnormal lymph nodes with diffuse cortical thickening. (Fig. 2).
MRI demonstrated enlargement and deformity of the left breast and a heterogeneous mass with little cystic areas. The kinetic map showed increased perfusion of the mass with rapid early contrast enhancement and plateau on the late phase. (Figs. 3-5).
These findings were suggestive of malignancy, therefore a core needle biopsy (CNB) of the lesion and lymph node were performed. Histopathology showed empty cystic vacuoles within lobulocentric granulomas. The vacuoles were surrounded by a rim of neutrophils and a well-defined granuloma composed of histiocytes and multinucleated giant cells. The Ziehl, Gram and PAS were negative. The final diagnosis was cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis (CNGM). Lymph node biopsy was negative for malignancy. (Fig. 6).
The patient was treated with antibiotics (ciprofloxacin) and steroids without clinical improvement.
A new MRI after four months revealed a radiological worsening with an increase of the cystic areas within the mass with restricted diffusion, compatible with abscessing of the mass and the presence of a cutaneous fistulous tract of which the culture was also negative. (Figs. 7-9).
The culture of the fistulous content was also negative. The patient underwent new treatment with methotrexate, and there was a significant clinical improvement after two weeks.
Granulomatous mastitis (GM) is an uncommon, chronic benign inflammatory condition with a variety of causes including infections (bacterial, fungal, mycobacterial), sarcoidosis, autoimmune process and idiopathic. [1-4]
Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis or granulomatous lobular mastitis (GLM) is a GM of unknown aetiology characterised by sterile non-necrotising lobulocentric granulomas. The diagnosis of GLM is made by exclusion of other causes of granulomatous lesions and histological findings. [2,3]
A distinct histological pattern of GLM termed CNGM has been described recently and seems to be associated with gram-positive coryneform bacilli. The species most frequently found are the lipophilic Corynebacterium Kroppenstedtii. [5-9]
The clinical and radiological presentation of CNGM are similar to idiopathic GLM and usually mimic malignancy.
Patients are young parous women of reproductive age with a history of lactation and are more likely to be Hispanic. [6]
GNGM usually presents as a palpable mass combined with signs of inflammation or malignancy.
Mammography usually shows an asymmetric density or irregular mass without microcalcifications. Ultrasound findings include irregular hypoechoic lesions with fluid collection or tubular structures. [7,8]
MRI can show a heterogeneously enhancing mass or rim-enhancing lesions that may also show segmental or regional non-mass enhancement associated. The masses may have ill or well-circumscribed margin and oval or irregular shape. The majority of the lesions demonstrate restricted diffusion and T2 hyperintensity that represents oedema. The kinetic analysis usually shows progressive or plateau pattern of enhancement. MRI may be useful when mammography and ultrasound are inconclusive, to monitor the evolution and to assess the extent of the disease. [3,4,10]
All imaging modalities can reveal accompanying findings like parenchymal oedema, skin thickening, nipple retraction, and lymphadenopathy.
These radiological and clinical imaging findings are non-specific and suspicious of malignancy, therefore a CNB must be done to rule out malignancy.
Histology is characterised by lobulocentric granulomas with mixed inflammation and clear vacuoles lined by neutrophils within granulomas. These vacuoles that represent dissolved lipid show a thin rim of neutrophils that are surrounded by histiocytes, lymphocytes, plasma cells and Langhans giant cells forming granulomas. The cystic vacuoles are not present in all granulomas. Bacteria may be identified in only 1 or 2 vacuoles and never outside of the vacuoles. [5,6,7,8,9]
The histologic and microbiologic identification of Corynebacteria in patients with CNGM can be difficult because the number is often very low and limited to the cystic vacuoles. [7,8]
There is no consensus for the treatment and patients are usually treated with a combination of antibiotics, steroids, and surgery. The recognition of this histologic pattern in a CNB sample and its possible association with Corynebacterium infection, despite the negative result of histologic and microbiologic studies, may help guide treatment. [7,8]
Written informed patient consent for publication has been obtained.
[1] Barreto DS, Sedgwick EL, Nagi CS, Benveniste AP. Granulomatous mastitis: etiology, imaging, pathology, treatment, and clinical findings. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Oct;171(3):527-534. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4870-3. (PMID: 29971624)
[2] Bakaris S, Yuksel M, Ciragil P, Guven MA, Ezberci F, Bulbuloglu E. Granulomatous mastitis including breast tuberculosis and idiopathic lobular granulomatous mastitis. Can J Surg. 2006 Dec;49(6):427-30. (PMID: 17234073)
[3] Pluguez-Turull CW, Nanyes JE, Quintero CJ, Alizai H, Mais DD, Kist KA, et al. Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: Manifestations at multimodality imaging and pitfalls. Radiographics. 2018;38(2):330–56. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018170095. (PMID: 29528819)
[4] Oztekin PS, Durhan G, Nercis Kosar P, Erel S, and Hucumenoglu S. Imaging Findings in Patients with Granulomatous Mastitis. Iran J Radiol. 2016 May 31;13(3):e33900. (PMID: 27853497).
[5] Renshaw AA, Derhagopian RP, Gould EW. Cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis: an underappreciated pattern strongly associated with gram-positive bacilli. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011 Sep;136(3):424-7. doi:10.1309/AJCP1W9JBRYOQSNZ. (PMID: 21846918).
[6] Shoyele O, Vidhun R, Dodge J, Cheng Z, Margules R, Nee P, Sieber S. Cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis: A clinicopathologic study of a distinct entity with supporting evidence of a role for Corynebacterium-targeted therapy. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2018 Dec;37:51-56. doi:10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2018.08.005. (PMID: 30248572).
[7] Gautham I, Radford DM, Kovacs CS, Calhoun BC, Procop GW et al. Cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis: The Cleveland Clinic experience with diagnosis and management. Breast J. 2019 Jan;25(1):80-85. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13160. (PMID: 30449049).
[8] D'Alfonso TM, Moo TA, Arleo EK, Cheng E, Antonio LB et al. Cystic Neutrophilic Granulomatous Mastitis: Further Characterization of a Distinctive Histopathologic Entity Not Always Demonstrably Attributable to Corynebacterium Infection. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Oct;39(10):1440-7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000479. (PMID: 26200100).
[9] Wang Y, LeGolvan M, Chapin K, Mainiero M. Cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis with corynebacterium and staphylococcus mimicking breast carcinoma. Clin Case Rep. 2018 Oct 10;6(11):2208-2210. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1801. (PMID: 30455922).
[10] Chu AN1, Seiler SJ2, Hayes JC3, Wooldridge R4, Porembka JH5. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of granulomatous mastitis. Clin Imaging. 2017 May - Jun;43:199-201. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.03.012. (PMID: 28364724).
URL: | https://www.eurorad.org/case/16598 |
DOI: | 10.35100/eurorad/case.16598 |
ISSN: | 1563-4086 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.