Uroradiology & genital male imaging
Case TypeClinical Cases
Authors
Gibran Timothy Yusuf1, Rahul Lunawat1, Rebecca Leung2, Osman Cancuri2, Stephen Moore2, Shweta Gupta2
1 King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UNITED KINGDOM
2 Princess Royal University Hospital
54 years, male
A 54-year-old man presented with unilateral right testicular pain and swelling 5 days post hernia repair. On examination he had a markedly swollen right hemiscrotum with tenderness, the testis remained palpable. The patient was referred for an ultrasound to exclude a recurrent hernia.
Biochemical markers showed raised inflammatory markers, but were otherwise unremarkable. Greyscale ultrasound demonstrated a heterogenous, enlarged right testis (Fig. 1) with a mildly thickened epididymis and thickened spermatic canal to the inguinal region. There was small volume intratesticular signal on colour Doppler imaging (Fig. 2). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) was performed with 4.8 ml SonoVue (Bracco, Milan) intravenously in contrast specific mode on Logiq E9 utilising 9L linear transducer (GE Healthcare). CEUS showed minimal peripheral enhancement of the testis with less than 10% viable tissue (Fig. 2). The patient proceeded to orchidectomy and developed abscess formation, treated with incision and drainage, but had no further complication. Pathological specimen confirmed a completely infarcted testis with no remaining seminiferous tubules identified.
Inguinal hernia repair is a common procedure with infrequent complications. Testicular ischaemia is estimated to occur in 0.2-1.1% of hernia repairs, however clinical diagnosis may be difficult as oedema, haematoma, hernia recurrence occur more frequently and ultrasound is essential. [1] Testicular infarction is critical to exclude as there is the risk of recurrent infection and testicular preserving treatments may need to be undertaken, especially as autoimmunity to spermatozoa can occur. [2] Colour Doppler imaging has been criticised for lack of sensitivity within the testis – particularly within the paediatric population and can lead to uncertainty over testicular viability. [3]
CEUS utilises low mechanical index imaging to resonate microbubbles of sulphur hexoflourine encased in a phospholipid shell. The non-linear signal produced can be isolated after linear signal cancellation from static tissue. The truly intravascular nature of the contrast results in imaging of both the micro and macrovasculature. CEUS gained widespread popularity in liver lesion characterisation due to the real time nature of the imaging along with the lack of radiation and nephrotoxic contrast. [4] EFUSMB (European Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology) have also released guidelines on non-hepatic uses, including the testis. [5] The testis, unlike many organs, lacks other imaging modalities; MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) requires prolonged imaging and is impractical, whilst CT (computed tomography) is undesirable given radiosensitivity and lack of spatial resolution. Testicular CEUS has been used to demonstrate intralesional vascularity, particularly Leydig cell tumours which show characteristic enhancement and may allow testicular sparing surgery. [5,6] Conversely as CEUS has the ability to definitively identify vascularity, the absence of enhancement can be useful in characterising epidermoid lesions, haematoma or testicular infarction.
CEUS has been used to describe global testicular infarction secondary to missed torsion or rarely epididymo-orchitis. [5,6,7] Typically global testicular infarction is from arterial compromise from torsion of the spermatic cord. It is thought that post-hernia repair testicular infarction occurs secondary to occlusion of the pampiniform plexus resulting in venous infarction. [1] Initially venous infarction may be compensated by hyperaemia from collaterals from the cremasteric or deferential artery. With progression there is central testicular infarction and peripheral sparing, which may not be immediately obvious on conventional ultrasound. In our case, the presence of minimal colour Doppler-signal is misleading as it is the sole spared area of parenchyma, which is difficult to determine on B-mode and Doppler imaging, but is shown unequivocally on CEUS and can expedite surgical management.
Written informed patient consent for publication has been obtained.
[1] Dellabianca C, Bonardi M, Alessi S. Testicular ischemia after inguinal hernia repair. J Ultrasound. 2011 Dec;14[4]:205–7. (PMID: 23396995)
[2] Koşar A, Küpeli B, Alçigir G, Ataoglu H, Sarica K, Küpeli S. Immunologic aspect of testicular torsion: detection of antisperm antibodies in contralateral testicle. Eur Urol. 1999 Dec;36[6]:640–4. (PMID: 10559620)
[3] Albrecht T, Lotzof K, Hussain HK, Shedden D, Cosgrove DO, de Bruyn R. Power Doppler US of the normal prepubertal testis: does it live up to its promises? Radiology. 1997 Apr;203[1]:227–31. (PMID: 9122398)
[4] Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI, Cosgrove DO, Kudo M, Nolsøe CP, et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound [CEUS] in the liver - update 2012: A WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 Feb;39[2]:187–210. (PMID: 23137926)
[5] Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, Gilja OH, Saftoiu A, Bartels E, et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound [CEUS] in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 [Short Version]. Ultraschall Med Stuttg Ger 1980. 2018 Apr;39[2]:154–80. (PMID: 29510440)
[6] Huang DY, Sidhu PS. Focal testicular lesions: colour Doppler ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and tissue elastography as adjuvants to the diagnosis. Br J Radiol. 2012 Nov;85 Spec No 1:S41-53. (PMID: 22674702)
[7] Yusuf G, Sellars ME, Kooiman GG, Diaz-Cano S, Sidhu PS. Global testicular infarction in the presence of epididymitis: clinical features, appearances on grayscale, color Doppler, and contrast-enhanced sonography, and histologic correlation. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am Inst Ultrasound Med. 2013 Jan;32[1]:175–80. (PMID: 23269723)
URL: | https://www.eurorad.org/case/16459 |
DOI: | 10.35100/eurorad/case.16459 |
ISSN: | 1563-4086 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.