Abdominal imagingCase Type
Iddamali Kariyawasam1, Yuranga Weerakkody2, Ruvini Thashila Gunawardana3
1 Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, AUSTRALIA
2 FRANZCR, Integrated Radiology
3 FRANZCR, Royal Perth Hospital
60 years, male
A 60-year-old male patient acutely presented with right-upper-quadrant and central-abdominal pain, elevated WCC (16,000), elevated GGT (247) but with normal bilirubin and amylase levels. Initial clinical diagnosis was of acute cholecystitis. An abdominal ultrasound was unremarkable apart from mild CBD (8 mm) dilatation. He represented four days later with worsening symptoms.
Initial abdominal ultrasound (not shown) showed a thin walled gall-bladder with no mural thickening, hyperaemia, pericholecystic fluid or gallstones. Common bile duct appeared mildly distended (8 mm) with no associated intrahepatic duct dilatation or overt associated mass lesion. Pancreas itself was poorly visualised.
Subsequent portal venous phased CT (Figs. 1-4) demonstrated a large (13 x 12.5 x 7.5 cm (craniocaudal, transverse, anteroposterior dimensions)) rim enhancing necrotic aggregated lesion centred between the duodenum and pancreatic head. Tissue plane delineation between the lesion and the pancreas was difficult. Pancreas itself appeared unremarkable with no pancreatic duct dilatation. A further conglomeration of presumed nodal disease also noted anteriorly. Main portal vein, superior mesenteric and splenic veins were patent.
Repeat CT at four days (not shown) post antibiotics showed no significant change. Further work-up with PET-CT imaging to assess distant activity, demonstrated high-grade activity throughout the main region with no activity at distant sites.
This case highlights an important teaching point for radiologists and trainees and that is to independently review images initially based on basic knowledge even when it is out of context with the clinical setting. While the clinical context is vital in image interpretation, plausible imaging diagnoses should not be disregarded simply due to being out of clinical context.
Once the nature of a pathology is suspected on imaging, the next step is to embark on a meaningful differential diagnosis often guided by location where in this case the primary target was a lesion of pancreatic, biliary duct, duodenal or necrotic nodal origin. It was the initial CT findings what prompted ongoing follow-up, PET-CT imaging and finally directed the clinician towards an ultrasound guided FNA.
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma in general has a lack of early symptoms and a tendency to invade adjacent structures and metastasise at an early stage . While presentation with associated acute pancreatitis has been rarely reported [3,4], presentation with acute “biliary colic-like symptoms” is extremely rare.
As with our case, CT is often a primary imaging modality, and once the diagnosis is known or strongly suspected is often used in conjunction with PET/CT [1,2]. Lack or gallstones on dual imaging modalities (CT and ultrasound), lack of ill-defined surrounding inflammatory changes as well as extensive distinct mass-like nature of the pathology on CT made a purely inflammatory aetiology very unlikely despite an acute clinical presentation and a previously well clinical state.
Pancreatic malignancy if originating away from the main pancreatic duct or biliary ducts could well develop into large tumours prior or causing symptoms.
A possible explanation for sudden onset pain in our patient may have been part due to the tumour margin passing beyond a threshold and causing pain in terms of pressure effects towards the right upper quadrant. The basis of the high white cell count and fever is uncertain and with a plausible explanation being a superimposed inflammatory response associated with the tumour [5-6].
Written informed patient consent for publication has been obtained.
 Lee ES, Lee JM.(2014) Imaging diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: a state-of-the-art review, World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014 Jun 28;20(24):7864-77. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7864. (PMID: 24976723)
 Dibble EH, Karantanis D, Mercier G, Peller PJ, Kachnic LA, Subramaniam RM. PET/CT of cancer patients: part 1, pancreatic neoplasms, AJR American Journal Roentgenology. 2012 Nov;199(5):952-67. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8182 (PMID: 23096166)
 Li S, Tian B (2017) Acute pancreatitis in patients with pancreatic cancer: Timing of surgery and survival duration. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jan;96(3):e5908. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005908. (PMID: 28099352)
 Roy BT, Roy RB, Metastatic pancreatic cancer: abdominal pain in a 22-year-old woman. BMJ Case Reports. 2015 Nov 26;2015. pii: bcr2015211361. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-211361 (PMID: 26611479)
 Steele CW, Kaur Gill NA, Jamieson NB, Carter CR . Targeting inflammation in pancreatic cancer: Clinical translation. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. 2016 Apr 15;8(4):380-8. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i4.380. (PMID: 27096033)
 Zhang DX, Dai YD, Yuan SX, Tao L. Prognostic factors in patients with pancreatic cancer. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2012 Mar;3(3):423-432. Epub 2011 Dec 8. (PMID: 22969906)