Ultrasound and Doppler ultrasound study
Musculoskeletal system, Hybrid imaging
Case TypeClinical Cases
Authors
Irene Vicente Zapata; Carmen Botía González; Marina del Pilar Lozano Ros; Joel Trejo Falcón; Begoña Márquez Argente del Castillo;
Patient56 years, male
A 56-year-old woman presenting to her general practitioner with a palpable, slowly growing and sometimes painful inguinal mass. The mass had been gradually increasing over the last year.
Initially the patient underwent an ultrasound exam that showed a heterogeneous mass deeper to subcutaneous cell tissue with AP axis larger than the transverse axis. It was predominantly hypoechoic and had internal vascularization. We performed a core needle biopsy showing a mesenquimal neoplasia suggesting synovial sarcoma.
Subsequently, a thoracoabdominal CT was performed for initial staging that showed an intraabdominal but extraperitoneal lobulated well-defined heterogeneously enhancing mass with some hypodense areas probably necrotic or cystic component and solid pseudonodular enhancing component with some punctate hyperdensities that could be peripheral calcifications. A pelvic MRI and FDG PET-CT were performed for presurgical planning. The mass does not infiltrate adjacent anatomic structures, it is hypointense on T1 and shows the typical triple signal pattern on T2 and a solid nodular enhancing component, seen as well on the DWI and ADC maps. Another hypermetabolic lesion was seen in the right humerus, likely a metastasis.
Synovial sarcoma is the fourth most common type of soft-tissue sarcoma, accounting for 2.5%–10.5% of all primary soft-tissue malignancies worldwide [1]. Synovial sarcoma originates from primitive mesenchymal cells and therefore is a malignant mesenchymal biphasic or monophasic neoplasm most often affects the extremities (80%–95% of cases) [1], particularly the lower limb around the knee. Despite its name, the lesion does not commonly arise in an intraarticular location but usually occurs near tendons ⁄ tendon sheaths and next to joint capsules. Synovial sarcoma also arises in areas with no obvious synovial or periarticular structures and has been described in almost all parts of the body thanks to the immunohistochemistry and demonstration of the t(X;18) chromosomal translocation or resulting SYT / SSX fusion gene transcripts, which is very specific for synovial sarcoma [1, 2]. It affects young adults with no gender predilection and manifests itself as a palpable and slowly growing mass that usually is > 5cm at the initial diagnosis. Primary intra-abdominal synovial sarcoma is rare, with less than 100 reported examples [3].
Histologic subtypes include three main variants: a classic biphasic type that has both a mesenchymal spindle cell component and epithelial component, a monophasic type (the most common) in which the spindle cells predominate and a poorly differentiated type [1]. Synovial sarcoma could present with calcifications, cystic changes and necrosis.
The imaging features of synovial sarcoma could be summarized as follows:
– CT: for initial staging. Non-infiltrative, well-defined mass often with punctate peripheral calcifications.
– MRI: for presurgical planning.
• T1: hypointense
• T2: triple signal pattern (hypo, iso, hyper to fat)
• Gadolinium enhanced: solid nodular enhancing component
– FDG PET-CT: to assess the efficacy of chemotherapy
The prognosis is poor because of the delay in diagnosis, which leads to local recurrence and metastasis. Only tumor size >5 cm is consistently associated with a poor outcome. Up to 50% of all synovial sarcomas recur locally, usually within 2 years, but sometimes many years later [2]. In fact, our patient had bone metastasis at the time of the diagnosis, confirmed with core needle biopsy.
The current treatment of choice is surgery, wide local excision (removal of the tumor, its pseudocapsule, and a normal cuff of surrounding tissue) without o with adjuvant therapy (if the margins are affected). The role of adjuvant therapy in the treatment of synovial sarcoma remains controversial. Chemotherapy has been used to treat metastatic or residual disease.
Written informed patient consent for publication has been obtained.
[1] Murphey MD, Gibson MS, Jennings BT, Crespo-rodríguez AM (2006) From the Archives of the AFIP Imaging of Synovial Sarcoma with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 26(5):1543-65. (PMID: 16973781)
[2] Fisher C, Folpe AL, Hashimoto H, Weiss SW (2004) Intra-abdominal synovial sarcoma: a clinicopathological study. Histopathology 45(3):245-53 (PMID: 15330802)
[3] J. Magaña-Reyesa y L.G. Domínguez-Carrillo (2016) Sarcoma sinovial intraabdominal. Revista de Gastroenterología de México 81(4):223-224 (PMID: 27198201)
URL: | https://www.eurorad.org/case/16216 |
DOI: | 10.1594/EURORAD/CASE.16216 |
ISSN: | 1563-4086 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.