Duodenal duplication cyst: A case report

Clinical History

A 48-year-old woman with a history of renal transplant due to end-stage renal disease of unknown cause came to our department for a routine abdominal ultrasound. She had no complaints.

Imaging Findings

The abdominal ultrasound demonstrated the presence of a cystic mass at the level of the porta hepatis, with no identifiable connection with the gallbladder or the extra-hepatic bile duct. It had no vascularity on the colour Doppler examination.

The upper gastrointestinal barium meal study revealed lateral and posterior compression on the second portion of the duodenum with no other abnormalities.

The abdominal CT revealed an elongated hypodense lesion with a gut-like wall lateral to the second portion of the duodenum that caused its compression. This lesion showed a peripheral enhancement after IV-contrast. The examination confirmed the absence of connection with the extra-hepatic bile duct or the small bowel.

Discussion

Enteric duplication cysts are rare congenital lesions that occur most commonly in the mesenteric border of any segment of the gastrointestinal tract and share the vascularity and the muscular wall with the adjacent tract [1]. They are named according to the location in which they appear. Duodenal duplication cysts (DDC) comprise 2-12% of these cysts and most commonly occur in the second or third portion [2]. They can be lined with duodenal, gastric, pancreatic or other mucosa and in about 25% of cases communicate with the native duodenal lumen. There are several theories describing its formation, although aberrant luminal recanalization is the most cited one. DDCs can be associated with numerous malformations, such as intestinal, anal or biliary atresia, malrotation, situs inversus, partial gastric diverticula, duplicated gallbladder or uterus.

Clinically, they can be asymptomatic or present with abdominal pain, vomiting, weight loss, pancreatitis, jaundice or palpable abdominal mass [3].

Ultrasound allows the identification of a unilocular cystic mass. The demonstation of an inner echogenic layer that corresponds to the mucosa and an outer hypoechogenic muscular layer ("gut signature" or "double wall sign") [1, 4] has a good specificity for this diagnosis. Visualization of peristalsis of this lesion also favours the diagnosis of DDC.

Barium studies can either be normal or reveal extrinsic duodenal compression. They can also show an addition to the duodenal contour in cases of communicating DDC.

Abdominal CT is important to show the absence of connection with the extra-hepatic bile duct and the relationship with the duodenum. Peripheral enhancement after IV-contrast and mass effect may also be visible.

Additionally, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a useful technique for accurate imaging of the biliary ducts, showing lack of connection of DDC with extra-hepatic biliary ducts. It can also be relevant for suggesting alternative diagnosis, allowing the identification of bile duct cysts, most importantly choledochocoele.

Despite the low rate of malignancy, cases of adenocarcinoma and carcinoid tumour have been reported in DDC.

Surgical or endoscopic excision is the usual treatment [1].

Differential Diagnosis List

Final Diagnosis

Duodenal duplication cyst

URL:	https://www.eurorad.org/case/12542
DOI:	10.1594/EURORAD/CASE.12542
ISSN:	1563-4086