CASE 12396 Published on 08.01.2015

Primary Carcinoma of the Rectovaginal Septum

Section

Genital (female) imaging

Case Type

Clinical Cases

Authors

Mónica Vieira1, Teresa Margarida Cunha2,Jorge São Martinho3

1. Hospital José Joaquim Fernandes, Unidade Local de Saúde do Baixo Alentejo, Imagiologia; R. Dr. António Fernando José Covas Lima 7801-849 Beja, Portugal; Email:vieira@med.up.pt
2. Department of Radiology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
3. Clinica Ecorad, Vila Franca de Xira, Portugal
Patient

61 years, female

Categories
Area of Interest Foetal imaging, Genital / Reproductive system female, Eyes ; Imaging Technique CT, MR, Percutaneous, RIS
Clinical History
A 61 year-old Caucasian female presented with pelvic pain and left inguinal lymphadenopathy. Her gynaecological history was not contributory.
Gynaecological and digital rectal exams revealed a slight bulge in the upper part of the posterior vaginal wall without mucosal lesion and a compact fixed palpable mass on the anterior rectal wall.
Imaging Findings
Sigmoidoscopy showed two lesions, one infiltrating the lower rectum (Fig.1A) and another producing extrinsic compression in the sigmoid (Fig.1B).
Computed tomography (CT) revealed a heterogeneous, solid mass with 5 cm in the pouch of Douglas, presenting invasion of the parametrium, uterus and anterior rectal wall. Inguinal, pelvic and upper abdominal lymphadenopathies were also present (Fig.2).
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed the presence of an irregular shape solid tumor lobulated contour and heterogeneous enhancement affecting the posterior aspect of the cervix and vagina, and the anterior wall of the rectum (Fig.3). There were no signs of endometriosis, no ascites, and no ovarian or endometrial pathology.
Cervicovaginal cytology excluded malignancy.
Histological and immunohistochemical stain analysis of the inguinal lymphadenopathy suggested a poorly differentiated carcinoma of Müllerian origin (Fig.4).
Due to the absence of resectability criteria, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was completed, but the patient presented residual disease, for which surgical resection was impossible.
Discussion
Malignant tumors of the rectovaginal septum, although uncommon, are thought to arise either from adjacent organs. Less frequently they develop in the tissue of the rectovaginal space.
Primary carcinoma of the rectovaginal septum (PCRS) is very rare and arising in most cases from endometriosis [1-9].
These tumors manifest as a well or ill-defined large mass in the upper third of the rectovaginal septum of solid or mixed heterogeneous appearance and spherical or irregular shape. It frequently involves the cervix, uterus, ovaries, rectal wall (usually preserving the mucosa) and lymph nodes [1-6, 9]. Our case was the first to describe MRI findings.
In our case the following facts should be considered:
(1) Due to the involvement of the rectal mucosa observed on endoscopy, it could be hypothesized the rectal origin, but that does not justifies the mass seen on CT and MRI, of which the major component was outside the bowel wall (Fig.2D and Fig.3F). Rectal carcinomas are mucosal lesions and may be associated with peri-rectal lymphadenopathy. Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors tend to manifest as a focal well-circumscribed exophytic submucosal mass, usually in the absence of adenopathies. Finally, immunohistochemical stain results excluded that origin;
(2) Cervical carcinomas are usually centered at the level of the cervix and are seen disrupting the low-signal-intensity fibrous stroma on MRI. In our case, apart from cervicovaginal cytology results, MRI also ruled out this hypothesis (Fig.3B). Cervical lymphomas are also very rare and may preserve the inner layer of the cervical fibrous stroma, but tend to be well-defined. Histological results excluded lymphoma;
(3) Even though the histological results allowed this hypothesis, on imaging studies, unremarkable ovaries were identified separately from the tumor (Fig.3G and Fig.3H);
(4) Primary vaginal tumors are rare and can appear as an ulcerating, fungating or annular constricting lesion. The carcinoma is the most common and arises characteristically from the posterior wall of the upper third of the vagina. In our case, the tumor was outside the vaginal wall (Fig.3A) and the gynecological exam excluded vaginal origin;
(5) Two cases of mesothelioma of the rectovaginal septum were reported [10]. Localized peritoneal malignant mesothelioma may have similar appearance, but nodal metastases are uncommon, and its presence should suggest another etiology. Loculated ascitic fluid may be present. In our case, the histological features also excluded this hypothesis;
(6) The hypothesis of mesenchymal tumors of the extraperitoneal space [11] was also excluded by histology.
Differential Diagnosis List
Primary carcinoma of the rectovaginal septum
Rectal cancer
Ovarian carcinoma
Cervical carcinoma
Vaginal carcinoma
Mesothelioma
Mesenchymal tumors of the extraperitoneal space
Final Diagnosis
Primary carcinoma of the rectovaginal septum
Case information
URL: https://www.eurorad.org/case/12396
DOI: 10.1594/EURORAD/CASE.12396
ISSN: 1563-4086