Uroradiology & genital male imaging
Case TypeClinical Cases
AuthorsEva Dyrberg, Jakob M. Møller, Helle W. Hendel, Henrik S. Thomsen
Patient88 years, male
[1] 1. Mosavi F et al. (2012) Whole-Body Diffusion-Weighted MRI Compared With 18F-NaF PET/CT for Detection of Bone Metastases in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(5):1114-20 (PMID: 23096187)
[2] 2. Bouchelouche et al (2010) Imaging prostate cancer: an update on positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Curr Urol Rep 11(3):180-90 (PMID: 20425625)
[3] 3. Kagan AR et al (1986) Radiologic contributions to cancer management. Bone metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 147(2):305-12. (PMID: 2425614)
[4] 4. Tombal B et Lecouvet F (2012) Modern Detection of Prostate Cancer\'s Bone Metastasis: Is the Bone Scan Era Over?. Adv. Urol 2012:893193 (PMID: 22013439)
[5] 5. Even-Sapir E et al (2006) The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT. J Nucl Med 47:287-297 (PMID: 16455635)
[6] 6. Padhani et al (2011) Whole-body diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cancer: current status and research directions. Radiology 261(3):700-18 (PMID: 22095994)
URL: | https://www.eurorad.org/case/10602 |
DOI: | 10.1594/EURORAD/CASE.10602 |
ISSN: | 1563-4086 |