CASE 5530 Published on 15.01.2007

Acute Myocardial Infarction

Section

Cardiovascular

Case Type

Clinical Cases

Authors

Kelle S, Nagel E. German Heart Institute Berlin and cmr-academy 13353 Berlin, Germany

Patient

64 years, male

Clinical History
Patient 1 week after acute myocardial infarction and revascularization of the left anterior descending coronary artery
Imaging Findings
The patient was admitted 7 days ago presenting with an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) of the anterior wall with troponine T elevation. The patient was immediately transferred to the catheter laboratory and the left anterior descending coronary artery was revascularized and a stent inserted into the proximal level. The patient was sent to MR imaging to assess infarct size. MR imaging consisted of wall motion at rest and late Gd enhancement 10 minutes after injection of 0.1 mmol Gd-DTPA-BOPTA (Figures 1 - 8 = apical to basal slice). Wall motion showed a resting wall motion abnormality throughout the anterior, anteroseptal and inferoseptal segments. Late Gd enhancement showed transmural scar with pronounced microvascular obstruction in the same segments. Please note the stent artefact in the left anterior descending artery in slice 08 (figure 8).
Discussion
Late Gd enhancement (or “late enhancement”, “delayed enhancement”) is now regarded as the reference standard for the assessment of irreversible myocardial damage. Whereas bright tissue represents mainly necrotic tissue with cell membrane disruption (in acute myocardial infarction) or replacement of large myocardial cells by small fibrotic cells (in chronic myocardial infarction or cardiomyopathies), dark areas within the bright segments represent “microvascular obstruction”. This phenomenon is due to a complete disruption of myocardial blood flow and, thus, failure to deliver contrast agent to this area. If imaging is performed early after contrast injection (1-3 minutes) microvascular obstruction is usually more pronounced than if imaged late (> 10 minutes). The optimal time point for imaging is still under discussion. The presence of microvascular obstruction has been related to a worse prognosis in comparison to patients without. Possible improvement of function after revascularization (due to “stunning” in acute myocardial infarction and “hibernation” in chronic myocardial infarction) can be predicted from the transmurality of the enhancement. Patients with transmural necrosis (as in the current case) are highly unlikely to show improvement of wall motion despite successful revascularization.
Differential Diagnosis List
Anteroseptal myocardial infarction with pronounced microvascular obstruction after revascularization.
Final Diagnosis
Anteroseptal myocardial infarction with pronounced microvascular obstruction after revascularization.
Case information
URL: https://www.eurorad.org/case/5530
DOI: 10.1594/EURORAD/CASE.5530
ISSN: 1563-4086