Head & neck imaging
Case TypeAnatomy and Functional Imaging
Authors
Poh Sen Tay1
Phyllis Wan Chun Ho2
54 years, male
A 54-year-old man with no known medical history presented following a road traffic accident complaining about loss of consciousness for a short time and left peri-orbital haematoma. On examination, his visual fields and eye movements were normal. He had no neurological deficit, but underwent brain CT to exclude intracranial pathology.
A computed tomography (CT) on brain and orbits showed fractures of the lateral and inferior walls of the left orbit (Fig. 5) with no intracranial bleed.
Inverted "U" shaped hyperdensities were observed within both orbits at their superomedial aspect, adjacent to superior oblique muscles (Fig. 1, 2).
Such hyperdensity represents incidental trochlear calcification (Fig. 4), which can mimic an intra-orbital foreign body, especially in trauma cases.
Avulsion of the superior oblique muscle is also a possibility. However, clinical suspicion of this injury was low in our case due to lack of signs of superior oblique muscle palsy.
The trochlea is a 'U' shaped fibro-cartilaginous pulley attached to the frontal bone in the superior nasal quadrant of the orbit. Its main function is to allow unimpeded movement of the superior oblique muscle.
The superior oblique muscle, which arises from the orbital apex just above the annulus of Zinn, passes anteriorly and upwards along the superomedial wall of orbit before gradually becoming tendinous and passing through the trochlea (Fig. 3). At this point, it turns posterolaterally, lying below the superior rectus muscle, before inserting into the posterolateral surface of sclera behind the equator of the globe [1-6].
The equator of the globe is an imaginary line encircling the globe, perpendicular to the axis of the eye and equidistant from the anterior and posterior poles. Due to its insertion posterior to the equator and on the temporal aspect of the globe, contraction of the superior oblique muscle internally rotates, abducts and depresses the globe.
The prevalence of trochlear calcification varies from 3-16%, as reported by several authors [1-3]. The exact aetiology of such calcification remains unknown. Hart et al reported an association of diabetes mellitus with trochlear calcification [2]. However, subsequent studies have shown conflicting results [3, 6].
The distinction between incidental trochlear calcification and an intra-orbital foreign body is important, particularly in the setting of orbital trauma. Shriver et al reported a case whereby trochlear calcification was reported as a metallic foreign body by the radiologist [4]. As a result, the patient underwent unnecessary surgical exploration. Xiao et al also reported several cases of misinterpretation of this calcification as a foreign body in their study [5].
We believe that there are certain clues that we can use to differentiate trochlear calcification from a foreign body:
- Location: trochlear calcification is located adjacent to the superomedial wall of orbit. Calcification elsewhere is likely to represent a foreign body.
- Morphology: This varies significantly. However, Xiao et al reported 3 common types of trochlear calcification - comma-shaped, dot-shaped, and an inverted "U" appearance [5].
- Symmetry: Up to 47% of trochlear calcification is bilateral [1, 4].
In summary, trochlear calcification is common and can be misinterpreted as a foreign body in orbital trauma cases. Therefore, it is important for radiologists and ophthalmologists to be aware of this entity to prevent misdiagnosis and subject the patient to unnecessary surgery.
[1] R.Salha, J.Shah, AJ.Sidebottom (2015) Trochlear calcification with coexisting orbital foreign bodies: case report and literature review. Oral Surgery 8: 48-50
[2] BL.Hart, JA.Spar, WW. Orrison (1992) Calcification of the Trochlear Apparatus of the Orbit: CT Appearance and Association with Daibetes and Age. American Journal of Radiology 159: 1291-1294 (PMID: 1442404)
[3] Sung Ju Ko, Yun-Jeong Kim (2010) Incidence of Calcification of the Trochlear Apparatus in the Orbit. Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 24(1): 1-3 (PMID: 20157406)
[4] EM Shriver, CA McKeown, TE Johnson (2011) Trochlear Calcification Mimicking an Orbital Foreign Body. Ophthalmic Plastic Reconstructive Surgery 27(6): e143-e144 (PMID: 21242848)
[5] Xiao T, Nileshkumar MK, Yan Z, Chen W, Liu X, Zhao Z, et al (2009) Trochlear calcification and intraorbital foreign body in ocular trauma patients. China Journal of Traumatology 12(4): 210-213 (PMID: 19635213)
[6] K. Buch, RN Nadgir, AD Tannenbaum et al (2013) Clinical Significance of Trochlear Calcifications in the Orbit. American Journal Of Neuroradiology 35(3): 573-577 (PMID: 23945224)
URL: | https://www.eurorad.org/case/15159 |
DOI: | 10.1594/EURORAD/CASE.15159 |
ISSN: | 1563-4086 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.