CASE 14437 Published on 26.02.2017

Cerebral Mycotic Aneurysm in the Setting of Infective Endocarditis

Section

Neuroradiology

Case Type

Clinical Cases

Authors

Margaux M McConn BA, Zain Badar MD, Zareen Razaq MBBS, Sajeev Ezhapilli MBBS

SUNY Upstate Medical Center,SUNY Upstate Medical Center,Radiology; 750 E Adams street 13210 Syracuse; Email:badarz@upstate.edu
Patient

34 years, male

Categories
Area of Interest Vascular, Neuroradiology brain ; Imaging Technique CT, CT-Angiography, Catheter arteriography
Clinical History
A 34-year-old male with a history of intravenous drug abuse presented to hospital with a four-day history of headache, nausea and shortness of breath. He was admitted to the hospital for suspected meningitis, and was subsequently found to have gram-positive bacteremia resulting in infective endocarditis.
Imaging Findings
Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain revealed several embolic ischemic strokes and right parietal subarachnoid haemorrhage [Figure 1], which was later confirmed by repeat computed tomography imaging of the head. These findings prompted computed tomography angiography, which revealed a cerebral mycotic aneurysm [Figure 2]. Conventional angiography revealed a small mycotic aneurysm in the distal M4 branch of the right middle cerebral artery that was not amenable to endovascular repair [Figure 3]. The patient was taken to the operating room for urgent craniotomy for open clipping of the aneurysm [Figure 4]. The patient’s decompensated heart failure necessitating surgical repair with the need for perioperative anticoagulation made surgical optimization difficult. An open surgical approach was a contraindication for anticoagulation and ultimately delayed the valve replacement in this patient.
Discussion
The prevalence of infected cerebral aneurysms is 0.7% - 4% among all patients with cerebral aneurysms [1]. Cerebral mycotic aneurysms (CMAs) are often due to bacterial endocarditis and commonly seen in intravenous drug users or immunocompromised individuals, a combination that was seen in our patient. Prompt diagnosis with imaging is paramount, considering mortality approaches 60-90% with aneurysm rupture [1].
Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is currently the imaging modality of choice for diagnosing CMAs with the overall sensitivity and specificity approaching 92.5%–96.2% and 93.3%–100%, respectively [1]. CTA allows for quick analysis of a large cerebral volume with the added benefit of three-dimensional reconstructed images for vascular mapping. Conventional cerebral angiography, though invasive, can be both diagnostic and therapeutic via an endovascular repair and is still the gold standard for diagnosing infected mycotic aneurysms. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been a less popular imaging modality used for detecting CMAs. Several reasons account for this including; lengthier examination times with less cerebral volume coverage, increased motion artifact and less spatial resolution [1,2]. Advancements such as three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography has shown promise of being more useful for detecting CMAs with a sensitivity and specificity of 95%-100% and 82%-96%, respectively [1].
The preferred treatment regimen for cerebral myoctic aneurysms ranges from medical to endovascular to open surgical management. The best option remains controversial and must be addressed on a case-by-case basis [3].
CTA is the imaging modality of choice for the diagnosis of cerebral mycotic aneurysms. Prompt diagnosis and management is necessary to prevent high mortality associated with aneurysm rupture.
Differential Diagnosis List
Cerebral Mycotic Aneurysm
Fusiform Aneurysm
Infundibulum
Dissecting Aneurysm
Final Diagnosis
Cerebral Mycotic Aneurysm
Case information
URL: https://www.eurorad.org/case/14437
DOI: 10.1594/EURORAD/CASE.14437
ISSN: 1563-4086
License